CIN
@
STL
Moneyline (straight up)
Strong
STL
confidence 65.5/100
✗ Pick lost
| Model consensus | 0 away · 11 home (11 models) |
| Win probability | 58% (STL, model average) |
| Edge vs market | +0.6% — model probability minus the market's vig-free implied probability |
| Sharp money | STL (+7 handle over tickets) |
100% of 11 models home; sharp money agrees (+7 handle)
Against the spread
Split
CIN
confidence 0.0/100
| Model consensus | 0 away · 0 home (no model line) |
| Sharp money | CIN (+1 handle over tickets) |
No directional edge from the available signals.
Iceberg Simulation
10,000 simulations
Win probability
CIN 43% · STL 57%
Most likely score
CIN 2 – 3 STL (2%)
Total 8.5
Over 45% · Under 55%
STL covers -1.5
40%
Total points — simulated distribution
The headline pick is the tip — this is the rest of the iceberg. We run the matchup thousands of times from the consensus and market lines to show the full range of outcomes. It's our own engine and doesn't vote in the consensus above. Free, like everything here.
Sources are aggregated and anonymized. We publish facts (which side each tracked model favors), not anyone's written analysis. Picks are graded the next morning — see the track record.
Advertisement