MIA
@
NYM
Moneyline (straight up)
Split
MIA
confidence 23.7/100
✗ Pick lost
| Model consensus | 4 away · 3 home (7 models) |
| Win probability | 51% (MIA, model average) |
| Edge vs market | -2.3% — model probability minus the market's vig-free implied probability |
| Sharp money | MIA (+11 handle over tickets) |
57% of 7 models away; sharp money agrees (+11 handle)
Against the spread
Split
MIA
confidence 0.0/100
| Model consensus | 0 away · 0 home (no model line) |
| Sharp money | MIA (+3 handle over tickets) |
No directional edge from the available signals.
Iceberg Simulation
10,000 simulations
Win probability
MIA 49% · NYM 51%
Most likely score
MIA 3 – 4 NYM (2%)
Total 8.5
Over 45% · Under 55%
NYM covers 1.5
67%
Total points — simulated distribution
The headline pick is the tip — this is the rest of the iceberg. We run the matchup thousands of times from the consensus and market lines to show the full range of outcomes. It's our own engine and doesn't vote in the consensus above. Free, like everything here.
Sources are aggregated and anonymized. We publish facts (which side each tracked model favors), not anyone's written analysis. Picks are graded the next morning — see the track record.
Advertisement